Editor's Choice
Members beef up ESG checks
A new report reveals that investors are keener than ever to secure their financial future by investing responsibly and will pull their money if their manager doesn't do so.
Execs sceptical of 2050 net zero goal
Confidence in net zero by 2050 is diminishing, with almost two-thirds of executives now anticipating the world will reach net zero by 2060 or later, up from just over half a year ago.
Minorities to have bigger say under Positive Duty regime: Rio Tinto
Sexual harassment claims are more prevalent in mining companies than in any other business sector, but better Positive Duty governance could turn the tide around, especially for minorities, delegates at the ACSI conference heard last Thursday.
New campaign pushes for reproductive leave
Calls for a paid reproductive leave scheme are mounting, as Queensland Unions launches a campaign pushing for new entitlements including preventative health leave. It comes as the Senate investigates issues related to menopause and perimenopause.
Whitepapers
Blue bonds: A growing resource for sustainability financing
Issuance of sustainable debt has exploded over the past 10 years as investors seek investment returns by allocating capital toward sustainability efforts.
New ESG reporting regulations - will they uncover existing risks for your company?
New, global ESG disclosure requirements are on the horizon, including for New Zealand, Australia, Europe, the United States and Singapore.
Closing Loopholes legislation
The Fair Work Legislative Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 has been split, with the first part of the Bill passing the Senate on 7 December ...
COP28 Unveiled: Assessing Global Climate Progress and the Road Ahead
This year's United Nations climate change conference, COP28, is in many ways an important milestone, as it will respond to the first so-called global ...
At first glance, the GPT report looks pretty comprehensive. However, it would be intresting to know what criteria Macquarie used (or how much investigation went in beyond just reading what was in the report) as OzMin haven't reported for a few indicators that you would expect that given they range from moderately to highly material to their organisation, they would definitely do so in order to attain real credibility with their report. I find it particularly hard to believe they didn't have anything/couldn't to report for EN1; EN7; EN18; EN24; EN25; and in particular EN30 & SO1!